Skip to main content

How to sort an ArrayList using Collections class in Java

The ArrayList class does not have any method to sort the objects stored in it.So we have can use

java.util.Collections.sort(aList);

where aList is an ArrayList instance. But the question arises as to how the sorting is being done by the sort method of Collections class in Java.

If one looks at the code of sort method of Collections class in Java API then we can see the following code:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
public static void sort(List list) {
   Object a[] = list.toArray();
   Arrays.sort(a);
   ListIterator i = list.listIterator();
   for (int j=0; j< a.length; j++) {
      i.next();
      i.set(a[j]);
   }
}
The sort method of Arrays class is being called so we see the code for sort method in the Arrays class:
?
1
2
3
4
public static void sort(Object[] a) {
    Object aux[] = (Object[])a.clone();
    mergeSort(aux, a, 0, a.length, 0);
}
Here we see that the mergeSort is being used as:
?
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
private static void mergeSort(Object src[], Object dest[],
                        int low, int high, int off) {
    int length = high - low;
    // Insertion sort on smallest arrays
    if (length < INSERTIONSORT_THRESHOLD) {
        for (int i=low; i"" for="" (int="" j="i;">low &&
              ((Comparable)dest[j-1]).compareTo((Comparable)dest[j])>0
              ; j--)
                swap(dest, j, j-1);
                return;
            }
     .........
}
From the above code we see that the Comparable interface is being used and hence we can conclude that the sort method of Collections class assumes that the objects present inside the ArrayList being passed to it have the Comparable interface being implemented. But one more question arises here that what if the class whose objects are stored in ArrayList does not implement the Comparable interface then what will happen. The result will be no compiler error but you will get a runtime exception. This is illustrated below:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
package example.java;
import java.util.ArrayList;
class Foo{
    int a;
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        ArrayList al = new ArrayList();
        ArrayList al1 = new ArrayList();
        ((Comparable) al).compareTo(al1);
    }
}
Output:
java.lang.ClassCastException
at example.java.Foo.main(Foo.java:11)
Exception in thread "main"


To avoid such a situation, you can either make the class to implement Comparable interface or supply a Comparator instance when calling the sort method of Collections class in Java API.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Asynchronous Vs. Synchronous Communications

Synchronous (One thread):   1 thread -> |<---A---->||<----B---------->||<------C----->| Synchronous (multi-threaded):   thread A -> |<---A---->| \ thread B ------------> ->|<----B---------->| \ thread C ----------------------------------> ->|<------C----->|

WebSphere MQ Interview Questions

What is MQ and what does it do? Ans. MQ stands for MESSAGE QUEUEING. WebSphere MQ allows application programs to use message queuing to participate in message-driven processing. Application programs can communicate across different platforms by using the appropriate message queuing software products. What is Message driven process? Ans . When messages arrive on a queue, they can automatically start an application using triggering. If necessary, the applications can be stopped when the message (or messages) have been processed. What are advantages of the MQ? Ans. 1. Integration. 2. Asynchrony 3. Assured Delivery 4. Scalability. How does it support the Integration? Ans. Because the MQ is independent of the Operating System you use i.e. it may be Windows, Solaris,AIX.It is independent of the protocol (i.e. TCP/IP, LU6.2, SNA, NetBIOS, UDP).It is not required that both the sender and receiver should be running on the same platform What is Asynchrony? Ans. With messag...

Advantages & Disadvantages of Synchronous / Asynchronous Communications?

  Asynchronous Communication Advantages: Requests need not be targeted to specific server. Service need not be available when request is made. No blocking, so resources could be freed.  Could use connectionless protocol Disadvantages: Response times are unpredictable. Error handling usually more complex.  Usually requires connection-oriented protocol.  Harder to design apps Synchronous Communication Advantages: Easy to program Outcome is known immediately  Error recovery easier (usually)  Better real-time response (usually) Disadvantages: Service must be up and ready. Requestor blocks, held resources are “tied up”.  Usually requires connection-oriented protocol