Skip to main content

When To Avoid Implementation of SOA?

SOA offers a change in perspective, a paradigm shift from object oriented to service oriented.As for almost a decade, most of the development is done using Object oriented technologies and that led to tight coupling many a times with vendor specific technologies like CORBA,DCOM or RMI.SOA offers to a new thinking of services rather visualizing in terms of objects which makes it independent of underlying technology.


If SOA implementation in an organization is not well thought of,planned and micro-detailed then it may lead to disaster, waste of valuable resources of time and money.SOA may not be a good idea for enterprises which are not too big and complex in their business process and do not depend upon business processes of its suppliers and business partners.

For instance, if an organisation which has distributed applications across the differ net geographies then it will be a good idea to implement SOA to integrate various applications to provide one cost effective,scalable and futuristic solution which will be capable to plug services on top of new applications.
SOA does not make a good business sense for organization which have very simple business processes,not involving too many business entities where a lot of collaboration is required to complete the business, for example a small online business of selling decorative items,which does not have heavy and business critical dependency on its suppliers to do business in a limited area.


Avoid using SOA for the sake of it,makes sense when it helps orchestration of complex,multi department/partners/suppliers business processes to smoothen overall business value chain.


Moreover, a SOA project can be jeopardized due to lack of proper,detailed,refined business requirements,inaccurate project planning and more factors which I will take up in my forthcoming blogs which will primarily focus on shortcomings of SOA projects and how to avoid them.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Asynchronous Vs. Synchronous Communications

Synchronous (One thread):   1 thread -> |<---A---->||<----B---------->||<------C----->| Synchronous (multi-threaded):   thread A -> |<---A---->| \ thread B ------------> ->|<----B---------->| \ thread C ----------------------------------> ->|<------C----->|

WebSphere MQ Interview Questions

What is MQ and what does it do? Ans. MQ stands for MESSAGE QUEUEING. WebSphere MQ allows application programs to use message queuing to participate in message-driven processing. Application programs can communicate across different platforms by using the appropriate message queuing software products. What is Message driven process? Ans . When messages arrive on a queue, they can automatically start an application using triggering. If necessary, the applications can be stopped when the message (or messages) have been processed. What are advantages of the MQ? Ans. 1. Integration. 2. Asynchrony 3. Assured Delivery 4. Scalability. How does it support the Integration? Ans. Because the MQ is independent of the Operating System you use i.e. it may be Windows, Solaris,AIX.It is independent of the protocol (i.e. TCP/IP, LU6.2, SNA, NetBIOS, UDP).It is not required that both the sender and receiver should be running on the same platform What is Asynchrony? Ans. With messag

Advantages & Disadvantages of Synchronous / Asynchronous Communications?

  Asynchronous Communication Advantages: Requests need not be targeted to specific server. Service need not be available when request is made. No blocking, so resources could be freed.  Could use connectionless protocol Disadvantages: Response times are unpredictable. Error handling usually more complex.  Usually requires connection-oriented protocol.  Harder to design apps Synchronous Communication Advantages: Easy to program Outcome is known immediately  Error recovery easier (usually)  Better real-time response (usually) Disadvantages: Service must be up and ready. Requestor blocks, held resources are “tied up”.  Usually requires connection-oriented protocol