Skip to main content

Why can any non-final class be casted to an interface?

A cast to an interface is always allowed at compile-time unless the class is final class and does not implement this interface.
5.5 Casting Conversion in JLS, you are trying to cast a reference type S to a reference type T:
  • If S is a class type:
    • If T is a class type, then either |S| <: |T|, or |T| <: |S|; otherwise a compile-time error occurs. Furthermore, if there exists a supertype X of T, and a supertype Y of S, such that both X and Y are provably distinct parameterized types, and that the erasures of X and Y are the same, a compile-time error occurs.
    • If T is an interface type:
      • If S is not a final class, then, if there exists a supertype X of T, and a supertype Y of S, such that both X and Y are provably distinct parameterized types, and that the erasures of X and Y are the same, a compile-time error occurs. Otherwise, the cast is always legal at compile time (because even if S does not implement T, a subclass of S might).
      • If S is a final class, then S must implement T, or a compile-time error occurs.
    • If T is a type variable, then this algorithm is applied recursively, using the upper bound of T in place of T.
    • If T is an array type, then S must be the class Object, or a compile-time error occurs.
The idea is that even if the class does not implement the interface, but one of its subclass maght. If the actually object class does not implement the interface then you will get a ClassCastException error at runtime.
For example,
interface MyInterface{}
class MyObject{}
 
public class Program {
  public static void main(String arg[]){
    Program po = new Program();
    MyInterface it = (MyInterface)po; //compile fine
    MyObject obj = (MyObject)po; //compile time error
 
  }
}
Why not final class? The compiler knows at compile time exactly what interfaces are implemented by the final class. If the compiler can determine at compile time that the final class can never be instanceof the interface, that's a compile time error.

Click below links to know more

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Advantages & Disadvantages of Synchronous / Asynchronous Communications?

  Asynchronous Communication Advantages: Requests need not be targeted to specific server. Service need not be available when request is made. No blocking, so resources could be freed.  Could use connectionless protocol Disadvantages: Response times are unpredictable. Error handling usually more complex.  Usually requires connection-oriented protocol.  Harder to design apps Synchronous Communication Advantages: Easy to program Outcome is known immediately  Error recovery easier (usually)  Better real-time response (usually) Disadvantages: Service must be up and ready. Requestor blocks, held resources are “tied up”.  Usually requires connection-oriented protocol

WebSphere MQ Interview Questions

What is MQ and what does it do? Ans. MQ stands for MESSAGE QUEUEING. WebSphere MQ allows application programs to use message queuing to participate in message-driven processing. Application programs can communicate across different platforms by using the appropriate message queuing software products. What is Message driven process? Ans . When messages arrive on a queue, they can automatically start an application using triggering. If necessary, the applications can be stopped when the message (or messages) have been processed. What are advantages of the MQ? Ans. 1. Integration. 2. Asynchrony 3. Assured Delivery 4. Scalability. How does it support the Integration? Ans. Because the MQ is independent of the Operating System you use i.e. it may be Windows, Solaris,AIX.It is independent of the protocol (i.e. TCP/IP, LU6.2, SNA, NetBIOS, UDP).It is not required that both the sender and receiver should be running on the same platform What is Asynchrony? Ans. With messag

XML Binding with JAXB 2.0 - Tutorial

Java Architecture for XML Binding (JAXB) is an API/framework that binds XML schema to Java representations. Java objects may then subsequently be used to marshal or unmarshal XML documents. Marshalling an XML document means creating an XML document from Java objects. Unmarshalling means creating creating a Java representation of an XML document (or, in effect, the reverse of marshaling). You retrieve the element and attribute values of the XML document from the Java representation. The JAXB 2.0 specification is implemented in JWSDP 2.0. JAXB 2.0 has some new features, which facilitate the marshalling and unmarshalling of an XML document. JAXB 2.0 also allows you to map a Java object to an XML document or an XML Schema. Some of the new features in JAXB 2.0 include: Smaller runtime libraries are required for JAXB 2.0, which require lesser runtime memory. Significantly, fewer Java classes are generated from a schema, compared to JAXB 1.0. For each top-level complexType, 2.0 generates a v